Interview with Andrew Swarbrick

Andrew works in library / trailer music and composes music for film. In our conversation we spoke about how different his creative process is for those two worlds and how he thinks about music’s relationship to picture and story. He also shared about his experience of work & family life and how important it is to look after yourself well by not allowing demands of industry and society to put pressure on you.


KAI:
Hi Andrew, great that you have time to talk today! I thought we could start with one or two personal questions about your journey and why you do what you do and then go on to talk about music relating to other media. So who would you say Andrew Swarbrick is and how would you describe what you do?

ANDREW:
That’s quite a big question. For the last 10 years I have pursued a career in composing music. I have quite a musical background. I played the trumpet in school, sang in a church choir and played in lots of bands. I didn’t know what I wanted to do but my dad always said to stick with things you enjoy doing. My initial thought was to do music at university, but at the time I thought that you either had to be really exceptional or be a teacher. First of all, that makes it sound like I think that teachers are aren’t exceptional but that’s not what I mean. I just didn’t really know what the career paths would be and kind of thought that if you wanted to do anything other than teaching you had to be extremely good on your instrument, for example. I didn’t really have much of an idea of how I could make a career with music. I suppose that’s something that wasn’t really talked about at school or in my development. I chose to do music technology and I didn’t really have any technical background such as studio experience or anything, but I went and did that. In my final year I made friends who were doing film production and we decided to all work together on a film for our first project; I was quite interested in trying to compose music for it. But, with it being a technical degree, I had to do something technical. I couldn’t just compose the music, so I started looking into MIDI orchestration and was quite interested in that.

I started to get very interested in orchestral music at that time. I wouldn’t say ‘classical music’, even though that is obviously part of that, but I was listening to film music and contemporary orchestral music. I was quite fascinated by the orchestra and had the idea of comparing orchestral music created with MIDI versus a live recording. I managed to get a local orchestra involved and was able to twist their arm to record one of my pieces. I then also did a MIDI version and compared both processes – that was my research project. I played a snippet from both and asked people if they could hear differences and what those differences were. It was quite interesting and I enjoyed it. Out of that I just wanted to find a way of making music my job. I decided to do PGCE just before I went to a pitching session in London. By this point I had some pieces that I’d made. It was orchestral music sounded something like The Lord of the Rings (2001-2003). Through the pitching session I got a contact in trailer music. I did do my PGCE in the end, but the introduction to library music and trailer music was a whole world of music licensing which I had no idea about.

I started working with this guy who was basically just pitching music for Hollywood trailers. That was really high quality and my production skills weren’t quite good enough for that. But he kept giving me feedback and helped me. Meanwhile I started working with other publishers. That was lower level and less pressure kind of library music. Around the same time I met a film director who is local to me here in Sheffield. Those two contacts, the trailer music guy and the film director are still contacts that I work with today. They are long-term connections. It’s been a very slow growing thing, but it got to the point when my daughter was born, about five years ago, when I made the jump to not having any other jobs. I’ve just about made it work. It seems to be going in the right direction.

As you probably know, I did one feature film with director Richard Heap. I loved that process! That was completely different to working with library music publishers. You do have briefs when you’re working in library music, because often the publisher likes to release music in quite an orderly fashion; but what I loved about working with the Runaways (2019) was the creative process with the director. I enjoyed actually getting involved with filmmaking and story. It’s just more than doing music for the shelf that gets picked up later for something that you don’t even know. My dream is to do more film. If Richard does more films I am probably quite well positioned to work with him, but I am also trying to get more connections in the film industry. Though I have climbed quite high in the library music world there isn’t necessarily any crossover. The only way that could happen is if a filmmaker was to use my library music and like it so much that they would contact me for original music for his project. Other than that, I think I just need to go and meet people, which means going to film festivals and events like that. It’s tough. I mean my ultimate dream is to do a Pixar movie. I’m a massive fan of Pixar. So yeah, that’s me in terms of work.

KAI:
What inspires you in life? What motivates you to do what you do?

ANDREW:
There’s another very big question. I would say it’s been a huge journey.

There is my faith, which is a big part. And there has always been the question of what God wants me to do with life versus what I want to do and whether that matches up. I never had a clear answer to that question. It takes a lot of personal investment to try and get a career like this off the ground. You’re putting a lot of your own resources, time, energy, headspace, and emotions all into creating music. So as soon as the question “Why am I doing this?”, or “Should I be doing this?” comes up and you don’t know the answer to it, you can really doubt yourself and make it quite tricky for yourself.

One question I would often come down to was “Who am I helping?” I suppose I feel like there’s lots of need in the world and why shouldn’t I be doing something else to help people? When I brought that up and talked to other people about that they would say, “Yes, but arts and music are so important. People need it…” – somehow that would encourage me but it also wasn’t quite enough. I suppose it’s been a journey over time where I’ve become a lot freer in what I’m doing, and I just accept that this is what I love to do. I love to express myself through music.

I love to watch Pixar films with my kids. I love the messages that they have, the emotion and the way that music adds to that. That gets me excited! I don’t fully know where it’s all going. It might be that in 20 years’ time I go back to teaching because I have this overwhelming feeling that I want to sow into people’s lives in that way. But essentially the whole journey has been that I don’t know what it is going to be like in a few months, including finances. Sometimes I know that I have money for the next month, but I don’t know about the month after that. It always works itself out somehow and that area has become easier and easier. It still feels tight though, because obviously the rest of your life grows almost at the same pace.

In the last few years it started to feel more settled and I have slowly started to get more capacity for other areas of life. Doing something like this can really dominate. It becomes so important to you and you are really trying to make it work. Like I said earlier, you are putting all your resources into it, and that can really take it out of you. Also, one of the things about being a composer like this is that you shut yourself in a room on your own, which has another impact on life. Mental health in the composing industry is a huge thing because of that very reason. So yes, you’ve got to graft and pave the way early on, but also look after yourself as well. I think over the last few years I’ve started to be able to do that a bit more and have relaxed more. Obviously I still have these huge things about “Where am I going to get this connection in the film industry or with a director or producer…” But I say to myself that even if I had the choice and someone said to me that I could work on this big title and choose when it happens… I wouldn’t choose for it to happen now anyway. I’ve got two young children and I wouldn’t want everything to kick off in that way right now. If I had the choice, maybe in five years’ time. So, in a way, if you bring God into it, He’s got a plan and I’m just enjoying what I’m doing.

The other night I was chatting to my daughter as I put her to bed. We had watched Encanto (2021) that day. I often say, “What do you want to say thank you for?”, we pray before we go to bed. She said, “You know what, I just really enjoyed watching TV”. I said, “Well, all right, we can thank God for the people who made the film”, and we did. Then I said to her, “You know, I would love to get involved in doing that kind of thing at some point”, and she said, “I know”. Then I said, “Do you think I ever will?” … you can’t make this up, but she then just started singing this song to me. The lyrics were something like “Your dream will come true, but for now just give me a cuddle.” What I took away from that was simply not to worry but just to enjoy being with your family. I think I’ve managed to balance things out a bit more and family helps. I’ve only got three and a half days in the week to work now. I don’t know what I used to do with my time when I had more time. How old are you if you don’t mind me asking?

KAI:
I’m 24 now.

ANDREW:
Yeah, when I was 24 – no wife, no kids – I just had all the time ever! The idea of that to me now is crazy! What did I use to do with that time? Now I’ve got my working week, which is three and a half days, and you just have to focus on getting things done in that time; that’s the time you’ve got. But if you think about it, that’s only half of the week. I’ve got another three and a half days, which is basically family and I think that’s healthy. If you’re trying to make your way into some sort of bit of the industry it can be so soul destroying, so relentless and so rejecting. You send your music out, but no one cares… and you have to deal with all of that.

KAI:
You talked about the difference of making library music versus working on a feature film. In terms of your creative process, how is that different?

ANDREW:
I think with library music the process is that you have to think about what this music is going to be used for and what makes it useful for an editor or someone putting together an advert or a promo. So, with libraries it tends to be quite a formulaic thing, really.

Looking at it in a very simplistic way, you do three sections with a break between each of them to give the editor edit points. Something that makes a good library track is that it has a theme and sticks to it. You don’t want it to meander off in any direction because it then becomes a lot less useful for the end user. They don’t want it to suddenly change mood. They choose the track because they like the mood, so if you change direction, it might not fit with what they are trying to do. You have to think about constructing a track that is going to be useful in a lot of situations. If you can do that then obviously it’s going to get used more. With film it’s completely different – it’s about the film. With The Runaways (2019) it was a conversation with the director to learn about what the film was about and to find out what kind of music the he thought he wanted. You might start working to picture straight away or you might not; you might come up with something like a bespoke library with let’s say thematic ideas, textures, and things like that. They might then edit to your music, and you might change it again to fit the picture later… It’s a process that you go through. In my case the director was able to share with me a 30 minute stretch that he had already edited. He told me that he wanted the music to have “intimacy and space” – quite abstract words. In a way though that is a nice thing because I’ve heard other people trying to work with directors who were attempting to talk in musical terms but weren’t musical at all – that can get very confusing. They might say something they think means something else… Basically, you need to get into the head of the director and find out what he really means. I imagine that’s just a relational thing. If you’re used to working with someone, brilliant. If you work with someone new you have to figure out how they work, how they think and what they mean when they say certain things.

The Runaways (2019) had a folk band in the pub type vibe and so I had ideas along those lines. I put together ten or so ideas initially and the director picked out one bit that he liked. It’s a family drama / adventure and I wanted to come up with a theme for the three children. Then there was an evil uncle character and I wanted to come up with something that would sort of be him. Oh yeah, and there was also a theme for the very sad part of the film too, which comes through at a couple of points. Once you’ve got those in the bag and the director likes them, that’s good. I then got given the scenes and it slowly came together. I would work over here on this scene for a bit, then on another… and I suppose there’s a cohesiveness to it. It’s just completely different to working with library music.

KAI:
It sounds like you enjoyed that process!

ANDREW:
Yes, and I guess it’s also something original. With library music you don’t know what the music is going to be used for necessarily. With film you know, “I’m writing for this child” or “for this uncle” or “this sad point in the story” … and you have that connection to it.

I think one thing that helps when you’re composing is to think about how humans respond. I find that if it feels true to you and you truly connect with it, it is likely that other people will as well. But it’s also relative. What’s ‘sad’ in one film might not be so sad in another. What might sound ‘dangerous’ in one film doesn’t necessarily sound dangerous in another. If the whole film has been quite light and you suddenly come in with a low peddled note… that will really affect people and they will wonder what is going on because it’s so uneasy. But if it’s a Marvel film where you just have a wall of everything… that one note isn’t really going to have much of an impact, is it?

I think there is a relativity to it, but there are idioms. Think of a whole tone scale. People refer to that and say, “Oh, it sounds dreamy”, everyone has that association with it. Those associations must have come from somewhere, they must be there for a reason.

KAI:
You are talking about film, music, and emotion. It’s a slightly broad question, but what do you think music can do that picture can’t… or film can that music or text can’t…? They are all different expressions, aren’t they? For example, if I watch a film without music or sound, I feel as though I am at a distance to it. It is more difficult for me to engage with it. As soon as music is there, I’m right there. Music seems to immerse people in a way that film by itself can’t. But then, for some people, if they just listen to music without picture, they would switch off because their attention span may be so short…

Do you have any thoughts on that?

ANDREW:
Well, I suppose in a film there may be a character and music can help the audience understand what might be happening inside of him or her – the things you can’t see such as emotion or what’s on their mind. They might be looking at something, but without the music you wouldn’t know what they were thinking. The music might dissappear and you are wondering if something is about to happen. Music can help the audience in that way.

One interesting thing that happened in The Runaways (2019) was a scene that I thought was quite funny. In the story three children escape across the countryside. The younger sibling, around eight years old, suddenly says, “I need a poo” and the older one replies, “Well, just find a big leaf” … and I thought that was quite funny. Initially the music I did was taking the theme of the children, using in quite a light way. When I showed it to the director he was like “No, no, no, no… this needs to be laughter in the dark.” What I didn’t appreciate was what was going to happen just after this moment. The scope of the film was on its way down and he explained that the mood was heading to a particular place. He didn’t want it to be light or funny at all. That’s what music can do; it can help the pacing and direction of a film – taking the audience on a journey.

If you put different music to different things, and it can completely change your experience of it. As a composer you have a lot of control, but I think a truly good film doesn’t have to rely on music. I hear a lot that directors want the music to save their film. “The scene isn’t working, so hopefully the music will fix it…”, maybe sometimes it can… but if that’s the case, the film isn’t good enough. I hear that over and over again.

I suppose what you want to aim for with the score, in terms of the ‘right moment’ for something, when you want the audience to really feel the depth of the situation for example, is setting them up beforehand. You can’t just play a touching piece of music and expect it to help the story. At the beginning of How to Train Your Dragon (2010) everyone hears a motif. At the time you don’t think about it much but then you hear it again later on in a sort of detached way. At one point in the film there is a moment between the dragon and the kid and you suddenly hear the motif in full. Because you heard it beforehand it’s even more emotional and you feel more connected to it. So, you can use music in that way as well. Like I said earlier on, I think music can help you get inside a character’s head. With film you can’t do that very easily. Theatre is way more obvious. Much bigger movements! Film is so subtle. The slightest movements or sounds can mean anything. In theatre you can’t expect the audience to see every detail.

KAI:
One of the things I am very interested in is to think of music, film, and other media as ‘communicators’. They bring a message that has some sort of impact on an audience.

ANDREW:
I don’t know if you have seen Encanto (2021) but the whole message of that film is beautiful and worth saying and the music really helps to get that message across.

KAI:
One of the things I’ve been wondering about is what kind of values we are sometimes being communicated in society, whether it’s about violence, romance, family life… In one way, by giving certain messages such a big stage (e.g., through cinema or other media) … are we saying something about our values as a society, at least unconsciously? I think as film makers and composer we’re not just making great art but we’re also saying something with it. I’m just wondering whether we are aware of that and whether we are intentional with it? You can really immerse people in an emotion or a story, especially with children and young people – that’s powerful.

ANDREW:
I suppose that’s very interesting with library music. With a film score you know what you’re doing it for, whereas with library music you don’t. One of my tracks was used on a Donald Trump video. It was a trailer track, really. They used it for his return from having survived COVID to try and tell people that he was a sort of hero who had survived triumphantly. A lot of those emotions might have been intended to come across when I made the track, but it was used for a particular message. I didn’t have any control over that.

KAI:
Thank you, Andrew. It was great to speak to you. I have been thinking about values and communication alot. Thank you also for sharing about your creative process and how work and family life go together for you.


To listen to Andrew’s music and find his latest work, head over to his website.

Interview with Steve Law

Steve is a composer with influences from classical music, jazz and pop. In our time together we shared our perspectives on the development of orchestral music today. Scattered throughout the interview are also insights into Steve’s compositional process. Are we abandoning the complexity, sophistication and beauty for chords I – IV – V? Or are there aspects in everything that we can celebrate?


KAI:
Thank you for taking your time to talk to me today, Steve. I wanted to ask you about your journey with music, composition, and orchestral life more generally. What do you think is the place for orchestral music in our contemporary musical landscape?

STEVE:
I suppose orchestral music today doesn’t perhaps have the sort of burning sense of importance that it used to have in the past where music had a sense of direction and people were discovering new things all the time. If you were waiting for Beethoven’s latest symphony to be performed or the Rite of Spring being performed or any of these sorts of big events. I find it hard to see any sort of clear direction and music anymore.

KAI:
Interesting to hear. In what way do you see music developing now?

STEVE:
I suppose we are mixing things that have gone before to try and make new sort of combinations of things. On the plus side, I think that anything goes now as far as music is concerned. It’s also easier to create music and get it performed. There are far more avenues to have your music heard if you’ve got the persistence and the talent to make that happen. As far as I can see the last big movement in classical music was minimalism. That seems to have had quite a big effect on contemporary music. The rhythm, the melody and the sense of joy in that music seems to have filtered through to current composers. Also this idea of coming back to more simplicity, more approachable music, let’s say, for the average person. That certainly has influenced even composers who write complicated music. From my perspective, I would say jazz went so far and we discovered so much. Pop music, I suppose, has been the most innovative in terms of form, but I mean I see that not really going anywhere musically. It’s become so formulaic now. Everything has four bar repeating patterns rather than experimentation and individuality. For me, the influence of pop and jazz music is impossible to escape. Why would you escape it? We can’t help but be influenced by the music we grew up with and music is always changing, isn’t it?

What would you sort of say to orchestral music now yourself?

KAI:
I find it very interesting to see that in a lot of audiences we are missing younger people. I have been wondering about how we can reach younger people with the orchestral sound. They might listen to pop songs on the radio and that is great, but I do think an orchestra has so much to give. On the other hand, I find that young people do love films and in many of them the soundtracks are saturated with orchestral music. They might not go to a classical concert, but they enjoy film music. Is it the style of music? Is it the fact that there’s other media involved, such as film?

STEVE:
Film music is something that people do relate to very quickly, don’t they? John Williams scores for example. They incredible scores, really… and that’s still being played today in concerts in the Royal Albert Hall with the film being shown – it hasn’t lost its magic. I hope that is a great way of getting young people interested. That’s how I heard the orchestra for the first time and it opened up a whole new world for me because those people were influenced by all these other composers, whether it’s Sibelius, Prokofiev or whoever it was. Film music is a gateway into classical music, isn’t it?

KAI:
This point is probably a good moment for me to ask how you became a composer?

STEVE:
When I was young my father played the piano at home. I always liked the piano. I copied the teachers at school playing the hymns in the assembly, so I learned by ear. When I was about twelve years old my mother bought me an LP of Scott Joplin’s piano rags. From that moment on I was interested in that. Then I saw a BBC documentary on George Gershwin and became slightly obsessed with that. I started to try and write piano rags and Gershwin type pieces. I then heard Rachmaninoff and Prokofiev and obviously Beethoven and others. It actually came to me a little bit late. I was writing music really from the time I first saw notated music in the form of Ragtime. Through Gershwin and Rachmaninoff the world just began to open up in quite an incredible way. It blew my mind hearing some of this music for the first time.

I grew up listening to pop music, which I loved. The music from the late 70s and 80s had a big influence on the sounds that I hear. I’ve just been watching a box set of The Rockford Files (1974-1980) and you know, you hear all these chords and things, and oh my goodness, I put those in my pieces! In the subconscious they have gone in there somewhere. I think there was a sort of hangover of jazz harmony into 70s and 80s music even for disco and some of the electronic music. Now everything has so much functional harmony and I find that very dull to listen to. I suppose I’ve got used to a very rich sounding palette of harmonies, but of course not everyone listens to music that way. I’ve spent my life listening to music intently. Not everyone hears music in the same way and not everyone has the time to listen to pieces of music over and over and over. You don’t find too many good listeners out there anymore. People often just listen to music in the background – everyone enjoys music in different ways. But then there is such a huge variety of music as well and that’s what makes it so great.

How about yourself? How did you how did you get into composition?

KAI:
I always played in orchestras. First of all cello in youth orchestras, later percussion. Particularly as a percussionist, sometimes I found myself thinking, “I understand what I am supposed to play, but that’s not actually what I would like to play.” There was a real sense of “I don’t think the composer really understood what a percussionist would want to do here…”, which then made me think, “I wonder if I could write something.” I wanted to write music that on the one hand side the audience would enjoy, but on the other hand side every musician would enjoy too. It is common for certain instruments to play melodies, such as the first violins and others, but I wondered what would happen if every instrument in the orchestra had a moment of shine… This wouldn’t be the case all the time of course, but I enjoyed thinking about foreground and background and giving everyone a space in that. I had lessons on several instruments and think that has given me a certain sensitivity to the music. Understanding the players who will hold your score in their hands is so important. I think for me it has also been of interest of going beyond the simpler types of music to thinking about different lines, interactions between instruments, vertical and horizontal movement and colours… I’m exploring all of this at the moment, so conversations like this are so helpful and inspiring.

STEVE:
This is the thing. The more you explore, the more you don’t want to be confined to just doing this or that. It’s quite incredible with jazz harmony, considering just how far that got. Think of someone like Bill Evans, for example. Look at the complexity, the sophistication and the beauty of what he did. It seems that this whole world was just there to be discovered: diminished scales, diminished chords… all these things and how they work. I mean it’s mind blowing! It’s like mathematics. It was there to be discovered and somebody found it. It then gradually evolved to the state it is at now. It seems a terrible shame to turn our back on all that discovery and go back to doing chords one, four, and five again. To me it seems a bit crazy to simply forget about these people; that’s terrible, really.

KAI:
Do you think your interest in harmony also comes from being a pianist?

STEVE:
Definitely! Always tinkering… Composing is a searching process, isn’t it? You’re constantly trying to find things. I think Prokofiev might have said that. I’m perhaps not the most harmonically adventurous composer in the world, but I do have an idea of the sounds I like, and I suppose that’s all we can do. I do admire composers who have the courage to invent more, to experiment and try to stick their neck out. But then do you end up with a situation where everything is so discordant that the discords don’t really work? What’s the point of discord then? There’s no right or wrong about it. I do like some modern music and maybe it’s just not for me. Also, when I write music it has to be life affirming, positive and uplifting. I don’t want to be dwelling upon negative feelings in my music and be self-indulgent in that way. That is not to say for anybody who tries to bring out these profound, dark sorts of feelings that that’s a bad thing at all. It’s just for me personally it’s the thing that picks me up in life.

There are so many composers out there but the one thing I do have, I think, is the ability to write a tune. If you’re going to write music, try and make it as memorable as possible. It doesn’t have to be a tune that makes it memorable, but it has to be memorable in some way. I’d rather write less good music than reams and reams of bad music, but at the same time you have to keep at it and just getting the practice of doing it every day in order to get better. Sometimes we sit around waiting for inspiration and it doesn’t come… You have to search for it, then it will come. It’s hard to find the time though. I teach the piano to pay the bills. I’d love to spend all my time doing music, but it’s difficult to justify spending vast amounts of time on composition. Chopin had to teach, like practically everyone else. For me doing this concerto recently… it’s really been tough mentally. Doing it all by myself and grappling with software as well… Also, there are so many composers, conductors and musicians who have found it very difficult to have a stable private life relationally, you know, it’s not easy.

KAI:
I’ve been thinking about that too, that success in life isn’t just success in your compositions, but being healthy in all areas of life. Sometimes that can means spending less time on, say music, and more time investing in your relationships.

STEVE:
… because obviously there is more to life than music.

KAI:
I can’t believe we’re saying this (laughing)!

STEVE:
It’s a part of life, isn’t it? – A great part of life! But that’s the arts in general. Imagine if you didn’t have art… We need it to express ourselves and feel human; not to feel alone and all these other things. And we’re very lucky to be living at a time where music is so accessible. When I was young, I had to go to the library to pick up a score. That wasn’t a big deal, I was happy with that. These days you just go on the internet. It’s become almost too easy. I mean I just do not understand how someone could be bored in this day and age. You’ve got all that at your fingertips. It’s incredible. We’re so spoiled. We’re so lucky.

KAI:
Maybe people are so spoiled that they don’t access what they could because it is so much…?

When you are composing, do you focus more on the music itself or do you think about who will listen to it?

STEVE:
I suppose I think of myself as writing a kind of clever popular music if you like. Hopefully it appeals to a wide audience of all ages. If I was to write video game music or something like that, I could perhaps be more specific about what I would want it to sound like. I just try to be honest and write what I feel. I think that’s all anyone can do at the end of the day. Musicians don’t tend to be very good businessmen, without being cynical, but you know, in terms of aiming for certain audiences. As far as writing is concerned, I would hope that my music connects with people immediately and is memorable. That’s all I can do. How do you approach it?

KAI:
I’m just thinking about that. I guess it’s one thing to write something inspiring but if you’re audience is not at the concert in the first place… I’m also thinking about how we can ‘bring’ music to people.

Something I found quite interesting with what you’re saying then is your love for popular music and how jazz influences your orchestral compositions. That can be a very good bridge for people, can’t it?! The popular forms being mixed with orchestral sounds… I have been thinking about links between creative practices and musical genres, whether that is pop, jazz, or collaborating with other arts.

STEVE:
There has to be some sort of cross-fertilization with what’s going on at the time. Saying that, Gershwin came up with something completely different just by being himself. He was a songwriter and he enjoyed the influence of jazz… he wasn’t a jazz player, but he did improvise and was a genius at what he did – and he did come up with something new. So, I think it’s going to be combining new things in popular music with classical music. We can’t turn our back on jazz and popular music. That’s not going to happen. It’s been discovered. But then, you know, maybe there’s also room for disregarding jazz harmony and going back to classical harmony as well. It’s the old cliché of ‘you can’t please all people all the time.’ Everyone hears music differently. That’s the problem. I never really know how people hear anything that I do. If one person likes it, that’s one more person than no people. If I can make someone happy, sharing something I’ve got that is worth something…. if it’s worth something and makes someone happy then that’s job done for me.

KAI:
Thank you, Steve. I really appreciated talking to you and hearing your perspective on music and how you recognize how your sound has been shaped over time. All the best!


To find out more about Steve, visit his website.

University Student Spotlight

Thanks to the School of Media, Arts & Humanities at the University of Sussex for sharing my project “A Musical Journey” on their social media platforms within their series of student spotlights.

They also included the following text in their newsletter:

Kai Vollprecht (BA Music) has been working on a video and music series across Germany, Switzerland and England over the past two years. The main part has been released already, two other sections are coming out soon. One is an Audiovisual performance (which was also submitted as a university assessment) and five short ‘Behind the scenes’ videos. 

You can view the series at: https://kaivollprechtmedia.com/projects/

To find out more, visit Kai’s social media profiles: Twitter @kaivollprecht, Instagram @kaivollprechtmedia, and Facebook @kaivollprechtmedia

Interview with Richard Wilkinson

Richard is known for his creative experimentation with sound in his compositions for video games and film. He is a Music & Sound award nominee in 2020 for Doctor Who and has been involved in advertising campaigns from companies such as Netflix, Disney & Columbia Pictures. It was great to hear from him about his journey into the industry, insights into music’s relationship with picture and the way he thinks of music as a language.


KAI:
Thank you Richard for taking the time to answer some of my questions about you as a composer and your working practice. To start with, how would you describe what you do and how have you come to do it?

RICHARD:
I am a composer, predominantly for video games, but I also do films, trailers, and theme parks etc. On my journey it has been a mixture of both instrumental as well as academic studies, then add to that hard work and luck! I found a job at a videogame company doing music transcriptions for Singstar and from there slowly worked my way towards audio, then music work.

KAI:
In terms of your work process, how much would you say have you been taught and how much have you developed yourself over time?

RICHARD:
Very roughly I would say 70/30 in favour of self-development. I had piano and trumpet lessons; A-levels as well as university taught me a huge amount too. But things like music-to-picture workflow, interpersonal skills, dramatic sensibilities are skills you acquire along the way rather than getting taught.

KAI:
As someone composing, what would you say fascinates you about music?

RICHARD:
What fascinates me is the unique ability of music as a language to inform and persuade, comfort and thrill – but often in a way that can be barely registered in the trance-like concentration of watching a film or playing a game.

KAI:
How would you then describe what happens when you combine music and film?

RICHARD:
It depends on what the intention of the producer or director is. What ‘should’ happen is that the music (or the absence of it) elevates the scene, film, or experience to its best potential. Sometimes that will be via a tried and tested cliché, other times by massively subverting expectations or leaning on a trope and then flipping it around. Music also adds a textural layer that enhances the sense of emotion, scale, or drama.

KAI:
What would you say music can do that picture or text cannot?

RICHARD:
I would say music is a more fluid language than picture or text. In most cases, the latter are relatively unambiguous whereas music communicates in a slightly different way. This is not always the case, taking the Mission Impossible theme as an example. Here, in the middle of an action scene we have a very overt use of music to convey excitement and self-referential ‘coolness’. The majority of the time though, music is communicating at a level which is ‘felt’ more than explicitly heard. The complex textural possibilities provided by arrangement, timbre, or orchestration, as well as the somewhat subjective and imprecise nature of the communication gives music a unique power in media.

KAI:
Practically speaking, what is your process from idea to fruition? Do you generally start from ‘nothing’ or is there a sketch or specific brief you work towards?

RICHARD:
It really is different for each project, let alone medium. Very generally you have conversations with the director / producer, then a suite encompassing the broad strokes of the music required. There is a first pass on the areas we think music will be needed, then revisions and changes are made as the project develops. Sometimes there is a specific brief, especially with film trailers on a tight deadline, but for games or films you usually have conversions, sometimes also Spotify playlists for reference purposes and then a suite or set of demos.

KAI:
On a slightly different note, in what ways would you say we can describe music as a ‘communicator’? Do you think as creators we think about the content we produce and how it impacts our audiences?

RICHARD:
Music is a language – it is not an inert thing. It communicates in some ways which are very analogous to speech, and others which are not. But texture, timbre, pitch, volume, harmony etc. are all communicative qualities that will change the meaning and effect of the music when altered. I think to a degree we do think about the content we produce and how it impacts our audience. Mostly that is in the context of serving the brief. To me, the best music for a project is hopefully always the best music for yourself, as well as for the audience.

KAI:
Speaking about audiences, when you compose, are you writing with a specific audience in mind or is it the music itself that is your focus? And lastly, how do you think we can reach new audiences with orchestral music, in particular younger people?

RICHARD:
It is all about making the best music for the project. Earlier on in my career there was often a mix of hubris and panic about trying to do ‘too much’ within a project in order to prove something. Now I am quite happy to write unpleasant music or very simple music, if that’s what is best for the project. I don’t worry about perception of it in isolation. In terms of reaching new audiences for orchestral music, what comes to mind initially would be to think about accessibility, cost, and concert length. Possibly also familiarity with the repertoire or mixing some shorter classical movements with film music or orchestrated chart music.

KAI:
Thank you, Richard. I really appreciated hearing some of your journey and perspective on composition and music.


To find out more about Richard, you can visit his website.

University Showcases Audiovisual Project

On the 8th and 9th of June the school of Media, Arts and Humanities at the University of Sussex is presenting work of final year students from a variety of courses, such as media production, journalism, music and filmmaking. The event takes places at the Attenborough Centre for the Creative Arts in Brighton and is open to members of the public. I am excited to share that the department has chosen one of my audiovisual works to be part of the exhibition.

“A highlight of the academic year, the annual Undergraduate Showcase is a celebration of our students’ outstanding achievement.” 

Dr Monika Metykova, Associate Dean (Engagement, Recruitment and Marketing)

“Emergency (What’s the time?)” is designed to convey a sense of urgency and inspire reflection. What is happening around us? Are we simply observing or actively involved? With our actions, are we being responsible? Drawing on practice from documentary as well as experimental filmmaking, the piece moves between abstract observation and first-person experience. It is designed to capture attention and to ‘suggest’ rather than ‘define.’ It is hoped that the experience leads to viewers pondering on the state of the world as well as their own lives and that it would encourage them to be intentional with their actions and the impact they make.

The piece can be accessed online:

https://www.sussex.ac.uk/schools/media-arts-humanities/study/showcase/undergraduate-showcase-2022/music/audiovisual/kai-vollprecht

Sir Thomas Beecham Scholarship Award

It was an honour to have been awarded the ‘Sir Thomas Beecham Scholarship Award’ from the University of Sussex.

The award of £1,000 is given as a ‘Sir Thomas Beecham Scholarship Award’ to a first year student for skills as an outstanding instrumentalist, outstanding academic work and contribution to music in general.

University of Sussex – Undergraduate prizes

Previous recipients include:

2019/20           Kai Vollprecht    Cello

2018/19           Suheil (Sunny) Shehab     Flute

2017/18           No scholarship awarded

2016/17           James Longcake      Electric Guitar

2015/16           Charles Higgins      Jazz Piano

2014/15           Natalie Whiteland      Harp

2013/14           Anton Pearson     Guitar

2012/13           Dominic Horsley     Tuba

2011/12           Tom Reade        Piano

2010/11           Amy Squirrell    Cello

2009/10           Louis Scott-Delany        Piano

2008/09           Joe Garvey         Guitar

2007/08           Matt Sheeran    Violin

2006/07           No scholarship awarded

2005/06           Suzie Wilkins     Flute

2004/05           Ruth Collings     Violin

2003/04           Stefan Haffner   Piano 

2002/03           Ben Rosairo       Piano

2001/02           Emily Hall          Piano

2000/01           Frances Marriott    Violin

1999/00           Darran Laine      Voice

1998/99           Emma Booth     Cello

1997/98           Hannah Baxter Guitar

The official publication of details can be found on the University of Sussex website.